How Important Is SD?

Practical Reloading

Lane substituted different Small Rifle primers in a proven .204 Ruger handload to try to achieve reduced standard deviation and better accuracy.

Conventional wisdom--and just about every reloading scribe I've read recently--suggests that employing consistent and uniform components and reloading processes usually results in top-performance ammunition. That's why handloaders segregate cases by brand and, when possible, by lot; prep the primer pockets and flash holes; trim them to the same length and chamfer the case mouths; seat the same brand and lot of primer carefully just below flush; and weigh each powder charge. They sometimes go as far as segregating the cases and bullets in like batches by weight before seating the bullets to the same exact overall length.

That might sound tedious, but routinely performing these steps helps ensure that the internal ballistics--primer/propellant ignition and deflagration--are as uniform as possible so the subsequent external ballistics--i.e., muzzle velocity and trajectory--may also be similarly uniform. Specifically, handloaders who chronograph their loads often equate obtaining consistent velocities with the likelihood of achieving smaller groups.


So what is the norm for consistent velocities? I've concluded from reading several sources that the Standard Deviation (SD) should be about 20, and half of that is even "more better!" In addition, other reloading authors have recommended switching primers to possibly achieve more consistent velocities and, hence, better accuracy.


In previous columns, I've related that my loading and shooting experience hasn't always supported this oft-repeated tenet. In fact, while preparing a handloading article on the .204 Ruger for a recent Hodgdon's Annual Reloading Manual, I achieved excellent accuracy with handloads that significantly exceeded the SD norms noted above. I revisited my findings in that report and decided to run an experiment to see if it substantiated or refuted the conventional wisdom and if I could reduce SD by substituting primers.

The load I selected delivered the best accuracy in the previous shooting review. It also exhibited rather large velocity variations, i.e., for 20 rounds, the extreme spread and SD values were 136 and 34, respectively. As you may know, the relative confidence one has in statistical results depends on two factors: how many data points and how precise they are. Calculating SD based on at least 20 velocity measurements is generally accepted as just barely good enough.

Because I'm an engineer first and a handloader somewhere after, I knew I must retest the reference load using the same components and rifle to assure any subsequent assessment or conclusions would be valid.

I retrieved the original data sheet for that specific handload and rounded up the same container of IMR-3031 powder, several more boxes of once-fired Winchester brass, an unopened box and a partial box of Sierra 39-grain BlitzKing bullets, and a pack of the same lot of WSR primers. Then I assembled another box of the reference test load. Of course, the same Ruger Model 77 MKII Target rifle was still on my gun rack, cleaned and ready for action.


I set up my Oehler Model 35P chronograph the same way I always do when testing small-caliber ammo with the three skyscreens spaced 2 feet apart and the first sensor about 6 feet from the muzzle. After running a couple of clean patches through the rifle's bore to remove any oil residue, I fired a couple of fouling shots before shooting the new batch of handloads.

Remington 7 1/2 and CCI BR4 primers delivered the most consistent and accurate groups even though the standard deviation for both loads was greater than the original reference load.

When I completed four, five-shot groups, I hit the summary button and perused the results. I'd already studied the target downrange through the scope and was generally satisfied with the load's accuracy, especially the last one that resembled a little bug just above and to the right of the point of aim. The average velocity was 2 feet per second slower than before. Extreme spread was similar in the lower 100s, and SD was exactly the same value at 34 fps. I pulled the target and measured each group. The groups averaged out at 0.56 inch, which was essentially the same accuracy the original test load had delivered.

Needless to say, I was pleased with the results. I had re-established the standard to which I intended to compare the additional test loads using the same components but with different primers.


I retrieved eight more boxes of once-fired .204 Ruger cases from my stash and full-length sized, trimmed, and deburred each case before cleaning and uniforming the primer pockets. I did not debur the flash holes since I hadn't done so before.

Just to make sure I didn't get the test loads mixed up, I seated 20 primers of each brand/type in a batch of brass, dispensed the prescribed amount of powder, and seated the bullets to precisely the same position using an RCBS micrometer seating die. I labeled the completed box and repeated the procedure until I had assembled nearly 150 test loads. I had intended to load a box with Federal 200 primers, but when I opened the only pack I had, there were only five left. I figured that's enough for one group and loaded 'em up!

The Shooting Results
While November and December are not the best months for good range conditions in my corner of the world, I was fortunate in picking three nice days to shoot and gather data. Before firing each box of handloads, I cleaned the rifle thoroughly and then fired two Remington factory loads to foul the barrel and verify my chronograph was working properly.

Overall, I was pleased with most of the shooting, but as one might expect, my technique was not always consistent during all three range sessions. I'm sure an occasional group was adversely influenced by the ever-present human factor. In all, I "called" only two rounds, which I disregarded from the accuracy results.

After I finished shooting the various test loads, I assembled and fired another box of the reference load using new lots of powder and bullets but the same WSR primers. As you can see in the chart, I didn't do quite as well with these, but, coincidentally, my last group measured spot-on at 0.55 inch. The SD was lower but still well over 20.

Observations
You know what they say about sta

tistics. You can usually take the same data and "prove" quite different conclusions. As best as I can tell, such is the case with my results. The one thing I clearly believe from the numbers is that you can shoot good groups consistently even when SD exceeds 20.

EFFECTS OF SWITCHING PRIMERS

GROUP SIZE (in.) VELOCITY (fps.)
PRIMER BAND PRIMER TYPE 1st 2nd 3rd 4th AVE. AVE. ES SD
.204 RUGER
WSR * Standard 0.80 0.53 0.62 0.28 0.56 3631 136 34
Fed. 205 Magnum 0.28 0.70 1.15 0.68 0.70 3563 92 22
Rem. 7 1/2 Match 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.65 0.48 3651 151 38
CCI BR4 Match 0.38 0.65 0.55 0.38 0.49 3673 118 37
CCI 400 Standard 0.75 1.12 1.05 0.85 0.94 3648 168 46
Fed. GM205 Match 0.75 0.72 0.80 1.00 0.82 3565 67 21
CCI 450 Magnum 0.55 0.55 0.75 0.60 0.61 3612 138 34
Rem. 6 1/2 Standard 1.05 0.75 0.65 0.90 0.84 3659 130 41
Fed. 200 ** Standard 0.70 n/a n/a n/a 0.70 3612 20 6
WSR *** Standrd 0.65 0.80 1.00 0.55 0.75 3613 97 27
* .204 Ruger reference load of 25.3 grains IMR-3031, Sierra 39-grain BlitzKing bullet, Winchester brass.
** Only had five primers available.
*** Repeated reference load with new lots of powder and bullets but with same primers.

Handloads with Remington 71/2 and CCI BR4 match primers delivered a bit better accuracy compared to the groups achieved with the WSR-primed reference load. However, the SD values for these two handloads were significantly greater than the results for the reference load.

I called my ballistics mentor, Dr. Ken Oehler, to see if he could shed any technical insight on this situation. When I related that the new reference batch of handloads yielded essentially the same results as before, he promptly responded, "You were just lucky!"

"Twenty rounds are generally accepted as the minimum amount of data required for statistical analyses," he continued. "However, you'd probably wear out several barrels to get a truly adequate data population to draw any valid conclusions for the experiment you're attempting. For limited data like you have, the SD values can only be used as an indicator of potential performance, like shooting a few three-shot groups to see if a specific load is repeating in further testing."

From a practical standpoint, I believe I've just reaffirmed the lessons learned from shooting thousands of rounds over the chronograph. The "real" results are how well your handloads perform after the bullets exit the barrel, i.e., how they group.

As we engineers say, "...the rest is simply cross-plotting data...."

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Recommended Articles

See More Recommendations

Popular Videos

The Future Of Special Operations Small Arms

The Future Of Special Operations Small Arms

We're taking a look at what the Army's Elite Units are using for service rifles and what the future of SOCOM sniping looks like.

Pinging Steel At Over A Mile Away

Pinging Steel At Over A Mile Away

Big bore semiauto or a lever gun? We look at the futuristic .450 Bushmaster and how it compares to the tried and true .45-70. ISS Prop House gives us the rundown on the guns used in Enemy at the Gate. We ping steel with a .300 WinMag at over a mile.

Black Hills Evolution of Rifle Cartridge: .308 Win. 175 Gr. Match

Black Hills Evolution of Rifle Cartridge: .308 Win. 175 Gr. Match

David Fortier talks with Jeff Hoffman of Black Hills Ammunition about the evolution of the .308 Win. 175 Gr. Match bullet.

All About .300 Blackout

All About .300 Blackout

The .300 Blackout is here to stay, and we take some time to look at new technology surrounding this cartridge. Next, we pit subsonic rivals against each other before stretching the legs of this CQB round out to 600 yards from a short 9-inch barrel.

See More Popular Videos

Trending Articles

Like situational ethics, standards of accuracy vary according to circumstances. How-To

Accuracy: It's All Relative

Terry Wieland - May 09, 2019

Like situational ethics, standards of accuracy vary according to circumstances.

The Smith & Wesson Model 19 revolver is back in production after being on ice for nearly two decades. Handguns

Smith & Wesson Model 19 Classic Revolver Review

Joel J. Hutchcroft - March 08, 2019

The Smith & Wesson Model 19 revolver is back in production after being on ice for nearly two...

These cheap postwar variants offer perhaps the best value on the vintage-Mauser market. Rifles

Yugoslavian M24/47 Mauser-Pattern Rifle

Joseph von Benedikt - May 13, 2019

These cheap postwar variants offer perhaps the best value on the vintage-Mauser market.

Daniel Defense has blazed a new trail with its first-ever bolt-action rifle, the Daniel Defense Delta 5. Rifles

Daniel Defense Delta 5 Review

Joel J. Hutchcroft - May 31, 2019

Daniel Defense has blazed a new trail with its first-ever bolt-action rifle, the Daniel...

See More Trending Articles

More Ammo

The new aluminum-tipped ultra-low-drag Hornady A-Tip match bullet provides unprecedented performance. Ammo

Hornady A-Tip Bullet Review

Jospeh von Benedikt - February 28, 2020

The new aluminum-tipped ultra-low-drag Hornady A-Tip match bullet provides unprecedented...

Starting in the late 1950s, the .338-bore size gained considerable traction — thanks to the .338 Winchester Magnum. Why? Because hunters are often after game bigger and tougher than whitetails. Here's a list of the .338-caliber greats in chronological order in which they were introduced. Ammo

11 Great .338 Caliber Rifle Cartridges

Payton Miller

Starting in the late 1950s, the .338-bore size gained considerable traction — thanks to the...

In single-shot firearms, .35-caliber rifle bullets are great performers in the .357 Maximum cartridge. Ammo

Put the .357 Maximum Where It Works

Allan Jones - March 06, 2020

In single-shot firearms, .35-caliber rifle bullets are great performers in the .357 Maximum...

HSM Ammunition has just released another new 6.5 Creedmoor loading. It's called “Low Recoil,” and the company says it produces from 47 percent to 53 percent less felt recoil. Ammo

HSM Low Recoil 6.5 Creedmoor Ammunition

Joel J. Hutchcroft - May 27, 2020

HSM Ammunition has just released another new 6.5 Creedmoor loading. It's called “Low Recoil,”...

See More Ammo

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Digital Now Included!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get Digital Access.

All Shooting Times subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.

To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine.

Get Digital Access

Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Now