Skip to main content

A Battlefield Victory

Here's what the landmark Heller Decision means for gun owners.

In November 1942, following the British victory over German forces at El Alamein in North Africa, Winston Churchill famously remarked, "Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning."

Firearms owners should say the same following the June 26th majority decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in District of Columbia vs. Heller. The Court stated that the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States "protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home."

We should indeed celebrate an important victory, but the Court's decision is limited, and we now face additional legal battles to determine its boundaries. As former NRA president Sandra Froman has written: "Heller is just the beginning. Thirty years of major cases will follow, fleshing out the contours." As we embark on these battles, already begun in courts across the land, it is critical for all Second Amendment supporters to clearly understand that what the Supreme Court did not say in its decision ultimately may be more important than what it did say.


The Court's decision was 5-4. In his dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer stated, "In my view, there simply is no untouchable constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment to keep loaded handguns in the house." If only one additional Justice had agreed, the Heller Decision would have been the opposite, and the next Supreme Court decision involving the Second Amendment will likely include new Justices appointed by the next President.


Most importantly, the Heller Decision did not strike down gun-control laws in general. The Court did not invalidate any other federal, state, or local firearms law or ordinance except for the specific Washington, D.C. law considered in the case. Moreover, because the Second Amendment has never been specifically "incorporated" by law into 14th Amendment protections of the rights of citizenship from state or local prohibitions, the Heller Decision does not automatically extend to existing (or future) state and local laws. That will require an entirely separate and additional set of legal battles.

Also, the Supreme Court specifically stated that "the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited," that "it is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose," that courts have long held "prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendment or state analogues," and that "nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms."

In terms of the question of whether some types of firearms might be banned so long as all firearms are not banned, the Court did state: "It is no answer to say, as petitioners do, that it is permissible to ban the possession of handguns so long as the possession of other firearms (i.e., long guns) is allowed... . Handguns are the most popular weapon chosen by Americans for self-defense in the home, and a complete prohibition of their use is invalid." However, the Court also specifically affirmed its long-controversial 1939 decision in United States vs. Miller, saying, "Miller stands only for the proposition that the Second Amendment right, whatever its nature, extends only to certain types of weapons," and that "we therefore read Miller to say only that the Second Amendment does not protect those weapons not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes."

By tying its decision to a standard of "typically possessed popularity" for guns protected by the Second Amendment, while not addressing the District of Columbia's separate ordinance banning possession of semiauto firearms in general, the Court opened the floodgates for future antifirearms legislation and court battles. Proponents of firearms rights can argue that semiauto pistols are without question overwhelmingly popular choices for home defense, and the similar overwhelming and growing popularity of AR-platform rifles may equally provide a defense against future "assault weapon" legislation, but these are battles that now remain to be fought.


As for the high rate of violence among the residents of the District, the Court also stated, "The Constitution leaves the District of Columbia a variety of tools for combating that problem, including some measures regulating handguns." It implicitly recognized firearms licensing and registration as acceptable, pointing out that because Heller's attorney "conceded at oral argument that he does not 'have a problem with... licensing' and that the District's law is permissible so long as it is 'not enforced in an arbitrary and capricious manner,' we therefore assume that petitioners' issuance of a license will satisfy respondent's prayer for relief and do not address the licensing requirement."

That's certainly not an assumption that all firearm owners share.

The Constitution of the United States was ratified in 1791. Now, 217 years later, a majority of the Supreme Court has stated for the first time--at least partially--that it means what we think it means. That's a start.


Technical Editor Dick Metcalf wrote the "Firearms Law" column in Shooting Times from 1977 to 1990.

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Recommended Articles

See More Recommendations

Popular Videos

Skills Drills: 3-Second Headshot

Skills Drills: 3-Second Headshot

James Tarr runs through the 3-Second Headshot drill.

The Glock 21

The Glock 21

Frank and Tony from Gallery of Guns spice up the Glock test using their non-dominant hands.

Hornady 6MM Creedmoor

Hornady 6MM Creedmoor

Tom Beckstrand and Neal Emery of Hornady highlight the 6MM Creedmoor ammo.

The Future Of Special Operations Small Arms

The Future Of Special Operations Small Arms

We're taking a look at what the Army's Elite Units are using for service rifles and what the future of SOCOM sniping looks like.

See More Popular Videos

Trending Articles

The new Winchester Active Duty 9mm ammo is loaded to the same military ballistics specifications as for the MHS program and has a rated muzzle velocity of 1,320 fps and a muzzle energy of 445 ft-lbs.Winchester Active Duty 9mm Ammo Review Ammo

Winchester Active Duty 9mm Ammo Review

Jake Edmondson - July 17, 2020

The new Winchester Active Duty 9mm ammo is loaded to the same military ballistics...

Cutting-edge projectiles provide unprecedented performance in the venerable old workhorse, the .30-06.Get the Most Out of the .30-06 Ammo

Get the Most Out of the .30-06

Joseph von Benedikt - April 01, 2019

Cutting-edge projectiles provide unprecedented performance in the venerable old workhorse, the...

With a 16.25-inch-long barrel, a tritium front sight and an aperture rear sight, Springfield's M1A Tanker chambered in .308 is a handy defensive carbine.Springfield Armory M1A Tanker .308 Review Rifles

Springfield Armory M1A Tanker .308 Review

Joel J. Hutchcroft - August 25, 2020

With a 16.25-inch-long barrel, a tritium front sight and an aperture rear sight, Springfield's...

While the 6mm-caliber cartridges that can be considered “great” are few in number, some have long and storied histories.12 Great 6mm Cartridges Ammo

12 Great 6mm Cartridges

Steve Gash - August 20, 2020

While the 6mm-caliber cartridges that can be considered “great” are few in number, some have...

See More Trending Articles

More 2nd Amendment

Environmental review on carrying guns leads to lawsuit?Brady Sues Over National Parks 2nd Amendment

Brady Sues Over National Parks

September 24, 2010

Environmental review on carrying guns leads to lawsuit?

Department of the Interior has finalized updated regulations governing the possession of firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges.Interior Announces Final Firearms Policy Update 2nd Amendment

Interior Announces Final Firearms Policy Update

September 24, 2010

Department of the Interior has finalized updated regulations governing the possession of...


By now, we've probably all heard about the horrifying Seattle mass murder May 30 at the coffee'Hero' in Seattle Mass Murder Threw Stools at Shooter 2nd Amendment

'Hero' in Seattle Mass Murder Threw Stools at Shooter

Shooting Times News - June 05, 2012

By now, we've probably all heard about the horrifying Seattle mass murder May 30 at the...

              By Scott E. Mayer    Washington DC--In an historic ruling, the U.S. Supreme CourtDC Gun Ban is Unconstitutional 2nd Amendment

DC Gun Ban is Unconstitutional

Scott E. Mayer - September 24, 2010

By Scott E. Mayer Washington DC--In an historic ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court

See More 2nd Amendment

Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Digital Now Included!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE Arrow

Buy Digital Single Issues

Don't miss an issue.
Buy single digital issue for your phone or tablet.

Buy Single Digital Issue on the Shooting Times App

Other Magazines

Special Interest Magazines

See All Special Interest Magazines

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Phone Icon

Get Digital Access.

All Shooting Times subscribers now have digital access to their magazine content. This means you have the option to read your magazine on most popular phones and tablets.

To get started, click the link below to visit mymagnow.com and learn how to access your digital magazine.

Get Digital Access

Not a Subscriber?
Subscribe Now