The Difference Between Boxer and Berdan Primers

The Difference Between Boxer and Berdan Primers
The rather complex Berdan priming system (left) used a simple cup containing an explosive mix that was seated in a cartridge case having a complementing pocket configuration. The bottom of the pocket was formed with a round teat in the center and two small flash holes. The Boxer primer (right) contains the explosive mix and an integral metal anvil, and the case's primer pocket is a much simpler cylindrical cavity with a single, larger-diameter flash hole in the center.

Q: What's the difference between Boxer and Berdan primers? When were they developed? Mort Hutchings, via e-mail.

A: During the Industrial Revolution, in the last half of the 19th century, the munitions industry transitioned from using blackpowder to early smokeless propellants with substantially greater energy. Concurrently, loose components and paper cartridges with separate priming gave way to cartridges having a metal case that contained both primer and propellant with the bullet fixed in place. Initially, these improved rounds were inside primed; however, case designs evolved until the more powerful centerfire cartridges used a primer seated into an external pocket formed in the case head.

Eventually, two priming systems dominated. U.S. inventor Hiram Berdan developed a simple cup containing an explosive mix that was seated in a cartridge case having a complementing pocket configuration. The bottom of the pocket was formed with a round teat, or anvil, in the center and two small flash holes on either side. When the firing pin struck the primer cup, the explosive was crushed between the cup and anvil, and it ignited. The resulting flame passed through the two orifices and ignited the powder charge.

On the other side of the pond, Edward Boxer, in His Majesty's service, developed a similar device except his primer contained the explosive mix and an integral metal anvil. The cartridge primer pocket was a much simpler cylindrical cavity with only a single, larger-diameter flash hole in the center of the pocket.


I don't know why or exactly when, but interestingly, the Boxer design was adopted by the U.S. military and domestic manufacturers, and the Berdan scheme became prevalent in Europe and much of the rest of the world.


Obviously, the Berdan case head design is more complex. Forming the teat to an exact shape and size is critical so that the explosive pellet is positioned properly between the cup and anvil, which is required for the Berdan primer to ignite reliably. Punching or drilling a hole in the center of the Boxer-design case head after forming the simple cylindrical pocket is much easier to accomplish.


Granted, the Boxer primer itself is more complex than the Berdan design. Punching out the little two- or three-petal sheet metal anvils is not so bad, but precisely assembling them into similarly small, explosive-charged primer cups without mishap was probably a tough manufacturing hurdle in the beginning. Once a safe and reliable automated assembly method was developed, the overall Boxer primer scheme is clearly the more attractive method.

And that's doubly true for handloaders. Compared to a Boxer-primed cartridge, reloading a Berdan-primed case is a PITA situation. Instead of punching out the expended primer with a decapping rod that passes through the center flash hole while concurrently resizing the case body and neck, you have to externally pry out the Berdan primer using a special tool. You also have to avoid damaging the anvil any more than it may have already been when the firing pin crushed the primer cup onto it.

I've never decapped or loaded a Berdan cartridge, but I imagine verifying the condition of the anvil and that the two little flash holes are not clogged with residue so that you're certain your handload will actually fire when you squeeze the trigger would be a difficult task. On the other hand, if a new Boxer primer is seated with just a little amount of resistance, I'm confident the round will reliably and safely fire.


That said, I can't envision any circumstance where the Berdan priming system would be preferable to the Boxer scheme.

 
 

Recommended for You

Improved ballistic coefficients lead to greater performance downrange without upping blast and recoil. How-To

The Key to Shooting Far: Improving Ballistics

Rick Jamison - April 17, 2019

Improved ballistic coefficients lead to greater performance downrange without upping blast and...

Daniel Defense has blazed a new trail with its first-ever bolt-action rifle, the Daniel Defense Delta 5. Rifles

Daniel Defense Delta 5 Review

Joel J. Hutchcroft - May 31, 2019

Daniel Defense has blazed a new trail with its first-ever bolt-action rifle, the Daniel...

The new striker-fired STR-9 9mm semiautomatic pistol from Stoeger Industries is reliable, ergonomic, accurate, and priced right. Handguns

Stoeger STR-9 Review

Joel J. Hutchcroft - May 17, 2019

The new striker-fired STR-9 9mm semiautomatic pistol from Stoeger Industries is reliable,...

See More Recommendations

Popular Videos

Pinging Steel At Over A Mile Away

Pinging Steel At Over A Mile Away

Big bore semiauto or a lever gun? We look at the futuristic .450 Bushmaster and how it compares to the tried and true .45-70. ISS Prop House gives us the rundown on the guns used in Enemy at the Gate. We ping steel with a .300 WinMag at over a mile.

All About .300 Blackout

All About .300 Blackout

The .300 Blackout is here to stay, and we take some time to look at new technology surrounding this cartridge. Next, we pit subsonic rivals against each other before stretching the legs of this CQB round out to 600 yards from a short 9-inch barrel.

Tactical Solutions Introduces New X-Ring Takedown SBR Rifle

Tactical Solutions Introduces New X-Ring Takedown SBR Rifle

Keith Feeley of Tactical Solutions sat down with Michael Bane at SHOT Show 2018 to talk about the new X-Ring Takedown SBR .22LR rifle.

See more Popular Videos

Trending Stories

The new striker-fired STR-9 9mm semiautomatic pistol from Stoeger Industries is reliable, ergonomic, accurate, and priced right. Handguns

Stoeger STR-9 Review

Joel J. Hutchcroft - May 17, 2019

The new striker-fired STR-9 9mm semiautomatic pistol from Stoeger Industries is reliable,...

How can a shorter-barreled revolver have higher velocities than a longer-barreled semiautomatic pistol? Handguns

Revolver vs. Semiautomatic Pistol: A Ballistic Oddity

Allan Jones - May 15, 2019

How can a shorter-barreled revolver have higher velocities than a longer-barreled...

Is the SIG P320 modular pistol the best polymer-framed high-capacity sidearm ever designed? Handguns

SIG SAUER P320 Review

Joseph Von Benedikt - September 13, 2018

Is the SIG P320 modular pistol the best polymer-framed high-capacity sidearm ever designed?

See More Stories

More Ammo

Created to fit in an AR-15 magazine, this short 6mm cartridge pushes 55-grain bullets to a muzzle velocity of 3,424 fps.  Ammo

24 Nosler Review: Everything You Need to Know

Layne Simpson - February 25, 2019

Created to fit in an AR-15 magazine, this short 6mm cartridge pushes 55-grain bullets to a...

After a 10-year hiatus, Aguila has brought back the Aguila 5mm Remington Rimfire Magnum—a great small-game round that has always had a cult-like following. Ammo

Aguila 5mm Remington Rimfire Magnum Ammo Review

Layne Simpson - November 19, 2019

After a 10-year hiatus, Aguila has brought back the Aguila 5mm Remington Rimfire Magnum—a...

Considering how popular the .270 Winchester has become, it's a great mystery why more .270 caliber (6.8mm) rifle cartridges  have not been introduced. Ammo

5 Great .270 Rifle Cartridges

Layne Simpson - May 28, 2019

Considering how popular the .270 Winchester has become, it's a great mystery why more .270...

See More Ammo

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.